Comments on: Moderation http://gov2.net.au Design by Ben Crothers of Catch Media Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:51:50 +1000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Ben Searle http://gov2.net.au/moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-2606 Ben Searle Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:01:35 +0000 http://gov2.net.au/?page_id=53#comment-2606 The Australian Government developed a policy in 2001 to provide access to government held geospatial data. The Spatial Data Access and Pricing Policy was established in 2001 and since then over 1,500 data sets have been made available. In FY02/03 over 50,000 downloads were made and this has quickly risen to over 1.5 million down loads in FY05/06. This is a very successful story in relation to open access to PSI, and demonstrates community interest in accessing government data. The policy is administered by the Ofice of Spatial Data Management (OSDM) and access to the list can be found at the following URL: http://spatial.osdm.gov.au/schedule/schedule_search.jsp The efforts of the Govt2.0 Task Force can assist in making additional spatial and other data available to the community. The Australian Government developed a policy in 2001 to provide access to government held geospatial data. The Spatial Data Access and Pricing Policy was established in 2001 and since then over 1,500 data sets have been made available. In FY02/03 over 50,000 downloads were made and this has quickly risen to over 1.5 million down loads in FY05/06.

This is a very successful story in relation to open access to PSI, and demonstrates community interest in accessing government data. The policy is administered by the Ofice of Spatial Data Management (OSDM) and access to the list can be found at the following URL:

http://spatial.osdm.gov.au/schedule/schedule_search.jsp

The efforts of the Govt2.0 Task Force can assist in making additional spatial and other data available to the community.

]]>
By: Alan Gresley http://gov2.net.au/moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-12 Alan Gresley Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:57:52 +0000 http://gov2.net.au/?page_id=53#comment-12 Moderate all you like, censor me! Moderate all you like, censor me!

]]>
By: Nicholas Gruen http://gov2.net.au/moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-10 Nicholas Gruen Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:25:18 +0000 http://gov2.net.au/?page_id=53#comment-10 Correction, the comment quoted above was actually moderated from the the thread beginning with the Minister's launch speech. Nevertheless I suggest such comments be placed on one of many millions of other blogs, not this one. Correction, the comment quoted above was actually moderated from the the thread beginning with the Minister’s launch speech. Nevertheless I suggest such comments be placed on one of many millions of other blogs, not this one.

]]>
By: Cait http://gov2.net.au/moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Cait Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:12:11 +0000 http://gov2.net.au/?page_id=53#comment-9 Give it some time Alan, they may not have read them yet if they've been caught in the spam filter. Your YouTube URL could set it off, I get lots of those caught in my blog's spam filter. Give it some time Alan, they may not have read them yet if they’ve been caught in the spam filter.

Your YouTube URL could set it off, I get lots of those caught in my blog’s spam filter.

]]>
By: Nicholas Gruen http://gov2.net.au/moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-8 Nicholas Gruen Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:11:12 +0000 http://gov2.net.au/?page_id=53#comment-8 Alan, I have just checked out the system. You were not being 'censored' as you put it. The spam software had put your comment in moderation because of the superfluity of links to other sites. The comments, as you concede are off topic and I have deleted them from the comments system. I will quote one of two similar comments of yours below, to provide people with an example of comments that I would prefer seen discussed somewhere else. Remember, you can publish pretty much whatever you want in the blogosphere simply by visiting Wordpress or Blogger or any of the other platforms and typing away. There will also be existing blogs that discuss the things you are keen to discuss. But on this occasion I don't think your comment is relevant to this thread. <blockquote>This push for Web 2.0 has nothing to do about open and transparent government. This is more about the incremental development of Police and Surveillance states. Are the masses aware of the growing list of people who question the official story of 9/11. http://patriotsquestion911.com/ President Asif Ali Zardari of Pakistan appears on the list. Also several 2008 US presidential nominees appear. Like Congressman Dennis Kucinich, Congressman Ron Paul and Senator Mike Gravel and one US presidential candidate in Cynthia McKinney. Another person is former US Vice President Walter Mondale. The list has ex members of many intelligent survives of the world. The CIA and M16 for example. The politicians who you hear no media coverage about also have started there own site about the truth about 9/11. http://pl911truth.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=47&Itemid=53 Rather than this being off topic, I would suggest that the importance of the truth about 9/11 is rather more deserving of discussion than open and transparent governments. This is a joke, the elites have received trillions since the GFC began. Now Australians I believe should have open knowledge about Bohemian Grove. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_PAqT2JZOw Yes, the elites have a ritual there called the ‘cremation of care’ in which they perform mock human sacrifice to a 45 foot stone Owl. I am of the opinion that these people are not morally fit to be in government. A revolution is coming. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vuNcQV7YHc Are people aware of these things or are they just hypothesized by the propagandized mainstream media and entrainment industries which is part of the Military-Industrial-Pharmaceutical complex? </blockquote> Alan,

I have just checked out the system. You were not being ‘censored’ as you put it. The spam software had put your comment in moderation because of the superfluity of links to other sites. The comments, as you concede are off topic and I have deleted them from the comments system. I will quote one of two similar comments of yours below, to provide people with an example of comments that I would prefer seen discussed somewhere else. Remember, you can publish pretty much whatever you want in the blogosphere simply by visiting Wordpress or Blogger or any of the other platforms and typing away. There will also be existing blogs that discuss the things you are keen to discuss.

But on this occasion I don’t think your comment is relevant to this thread.

This push for Web 2.0 has nothing to do about open and transparent government. This is more about the incremental development of Police and Surveillance states.

Are the masses aware of the growing list of people who question the official story of 9/11.

http://patriotsquestion911.com/

President Asif Ali Zardari of Pakistan appears on the list. Also several 2008 US presidential nominees appear. Like Congressman Dennis Kucinich, Congressman Ron Paul and Senator Mike Gravel and one US presidential candidate in Cynthia McKinney.

Another person is former US Vice President Walter Mondale. The list has ex members of many intelligent survives of the world. The CIA and M16 for example. The politicians who you hear no media coverage about also have started there own site about the truth about 9/11.

http://pl911truth.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=47&Itemid=53

Rather than this being off topic, I would suggest that the importance of the truth about 9/11 is rather more deserving of discussion than open and transparent governments. This is a joke, the elites have received trillions since the GFC began.

Now Australians I believe should have open knowledge about Bohemian Grove.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_PAqT2JZOw

Yes, the elites have a ritual there called the ‘cremation of care’ in which they perform mock human sacrifice to a 45 foot stone Owl. I am of the opinion that these people are not morally fit to be in government. A revolution is coming.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vuNcQV7YHc

Are people aware of these things or are they just hypothesized by the propagandized mainstream media and entrainment industries which is part of the Military-Industrial-Pharmaceutical complex?

]]>
By: Alan Gresley http://gov2.net.au/moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Alan Gresley Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:06:23 +0000 http://gov2.net.au/?page_id=53#comment-7 I have submitted three comments on this blog post, two as replies. http://gov2.net.au/2009/06/22/launch-speech/ I can see only one comment which is a reply. Transparent governments should not censor! I have submitted three comments on this blog post, two as replies.

http://gov2.net.au/2009/06/22/launch-speech/

I can see only one comment which is a reply. Transparent governments should not censor!

]]>
By: Alan Gresley http://gov2.net.au/moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Alan Gresley Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:03:21 +0000 http://gov2.net.au/?page_id=53#comment-6 My comments may be slightly off-topic, but why am I being censored? My comments may be slightly off-topic, but why am I being censored?

]]>
By: Matt Moore http://gov2.net.au/moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-5 Matt Moore Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:10:17 +0000 http://gov2.net.au/?page_id=53#comment-5 Good luck with the taskforce. There is Gov 2.0-related event happening in Sydney on Tuesday June 30th, more info here: http://nswkmforum.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/conversation-cafe-is-there-a-knowledge-dimension-to-government-2-0-june-30/ Good luck with the taskforce. There is Gov 2.0-related event happening in Sydney on Tuesday June 30th, more info here: http://nswkmforum.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/conversation-cafe-is-there-a-knowledge-dimension-to-government-2-0-june-30/

]]>
By: Taskforce Secretariat http://gov2.net.au/moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Taskforce Secretariat Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:19:04 +0000 http://gov2.net.au/?page_id=53#comment-4 Thanks Me. We appreciate your feedback, and decided to include your suggestion in the moderation policy. Thanks Me. We appreciate your feedback, and decided to include your suggestion in the moderation policy.

]]>
By: Me http://gov2.net.au/moderation/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Me Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:02:50 +0000 http://gov2.net.au/?page_id=53#comment-3 You are free to make your points clearly and, if you disagree with someone, to say so, if you wish, forcefully. If you cross a line (which admittedly cannot be drawn with absolute precision) and become abusive, defamatory or vexatiously repetitive<i>, or if you breach someone's privacy,</i> you will be in breach of the policy.<strike>, as will be if you breach someone’s privacy.</strike> You are free to make your points clearly and, if you disagree with someone, to say so, if you wish, forcefully. If you cross a line (which admittedly cannot be drawn with absolute precision) and become abusive, defamatory or vexatiously repetitive, or if you breach someone’s privacy, you will be in breach of the policy., as will be if you breach someone’s privacy.

]]>