Government 2.0 Taskforce » Innovation http://gov2.net.au Design by Ben Crothers of Catch Media Tue, 04 May 2010 23:55:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 en hourly 1 And the Mashie Goes To…[drum roll] http://gov2.net.au/blog/2009/12/14/and-the-mashie-goes-to/ http://gov2.net.au/blog/2009/12/14/and-the-mashie-goes-to/#comments Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:24:47 +0000 Mia Garlick http://gov2.net.au/?p=1453 Mashie

It gives us great pleasure to announce that the winners of the MashupAustralia contest have now been announced.

In case you have missed it, here is some background about the contest – from launch and initial response to a final wrap-up.

We’ve also tried to follow the conversation that you have been having elsewhere about the contest. Most recently, we came across this interesting four part discussion on the All Things Spatial blog about some of the contest entries (see Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4.

All that remains is to know who will go home with the coveted Mashie (see image (yes, the trophy is a potato masher)) and, of course, the prize money. Our esteemed judging panel have deliberated and considered all of the entries against the rules. As we indicated might happen, more than one prize per category has been awarded because there were so many high quality entries.

For Excellence in Mashing, the Mashies go to:

  • Surburban Trends a mashup of different types of crime and census data that allows you compare and contrast suburbs by a range of economic, education, safety and socio-economic indicators. The judges thought the ability to compare suburbs visually combined with the selective choice of statistics was excellent especially in a field dominated by many entries using similar datasets.
  • Know Where You Live which bills itself as a prototype of a mashup of a range of open access government data based on postcodes so that you can truly know where you live. The judges loved the very citizen-centric “common questions” user experience of this app and the groovy, and again, selective repackaging of what could otherwise be considered (we’ll be honest here) slightly boring data. The integration of publicly-held historical photographs and rental price data was a nice touch as was the use of Google’s satellite images in the header. Judges were disappointed that some of the data for states other than NSW wasn’t available for inclusion. The focus on compliance only with the most modern standards compliant browsers was not seen as detrimental to this mashup.

The Highly Commendable Mashups were:

  • geo2gov which serves an excellent example of what can be possible with open government data. This entry provided an online service that will take a location description in a wide range of formats, and map that location to the government. The testament to its utility was demonstrated by the fact that several other entries used geo2gov. Contest judge Mark Pesce said that this app that was such an impressive prototype of what was possible with government data that it made his geeky pants wet.
  • Firemash a timely entry that analyses notices from the state of New South Wales’ Rural Fire Service and sends you a tweet if you are at risk. The judges were particularly impressed with this entry’s use of different services and its real time web goodness. The ability for citizens to submit fire information and be notified of nearby fires was quite unique. The dual purpose – citizen to Government and Government to citizen – possibilities with this site made it one of the few submitted mashups to explore data in this way.

And the Notable Mashing Achievements were:

  • In Their Honour which brings together service records, maps and photographs for each of the service men and women who have died for Australia. The judging panel felt that although a similar service already exists provided by the Australian War Memorial,  this entry explored the data in a noticeably different way attracting the opportunity for a different kind of engagement with the same datasets.
  • LobbyLens shows connections relevant to government business (e.g., government suppliers, government agencies, politician responsibilities, lobbyists etc.). For the judging panel, the relationship visualizations that this entry gave aligned well with much of purpose of Government 2.0 even if its usability needs a lot of work.
  • FlipExplorer this entry combines an interactive online search interface, 3D tagcloud, and timeline widget, which allows you to browse through the Powerhouse Museum’s Collection as you would any physical book. Although not truly a mashup of more than one data source, the judges felt that this was an impressive use of a visual interface.

For the People’s Choice Award, once we adjusted for the malicious voting up and voting down (shame on you who partook), the clear winner was In Their Honour — which is consistent with the judge’s thoughts on its usability. As commenter Nerida Deane said “I just looked up my Great Uncle Al and found the site easy to use and I liked the information it gave me. Maybe one day I’ll have a chance to visit his memorial.”

The Student Prize goes to Suburban Trends (obviously) and to Suburban Matchmaker, which the judges felt was a clever idea (albeit potentially raising some interesting questions for future ethics classes). Because rewarding and encouraging our students can never be a bad thing, the judges also agreed to award both Earth:Australia and Community Rivers each a partial student prize for a commendable effort in student mashing.

Finally, the Transformation Challenge for entries that enhance and/or make datasets available for re-use programmatically – the bonus prizes are awarded to geo2gov (see above), Neogopher (judges’ comment: this provides a pretty comprehensive set of transformation and API access to many of the data.australia.gov.au datasets in one place) and absxml (judges’ comment: a nice conversion idea that needs a bit of work to make it more usable.).

Finally, as part of any awards ceremony some thank-yous are required. A repeated big thank you to all of those involved in organizing the hackfests, to those who participated in the events and everyone who submitted entries or provided comments and feedback. Many thanks are due to our esteemed judging panel for their time and attention to all 82 entries. Thanks also to the Federal, State and Territory government agencies who provided datasets for the contest. And to the teams on the Taskforce Secretariat at the Australian Government Information Management Office and at the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy who provided the project support. This has been a collaboration in every sense of the word and hopefully demonstrated its purpose namely, to show what is possible when agencies liberate their data…

[cue the music to cut the presenter short and get them off the stage]

]]>
http://gov2.net.au/blog/2009/12/14/and-the-mashie-goes-to/feed/ 7
Advancing Public Sector Innovation http://gov2.net.au/blog/2009/09/07/advancing-public-sector-innovation/ http://gov2.net.au/blog/2009/09/07/advancing-public-sector-innovation/#comments Mon, 07 Sep 2009 02:07:12 +0000 Patricia Kelly http://gov2.net.au/?p=870 Patricia Kelly is a Deputy Secretary at the Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research and  Chair of the Steering Committee overseeing the Public Sector Innovation Management Advisory Committee Project.

One of the issues that the Gov 2.0 Taskforce is looking at is how to “build a culture of online innovation within Government”. However, online innovation is only one component (albeit at important one) of the “innovation system” within the public sector. There is innovation in policy making, in program management, and in service delivery. There can be innovation in how the public sector interacts with citizens, stakeholders and clients outside of the digital realm. There can be innovation in how public problems are thought about and in how the public sector works with others to solve them. It may involve innovation at the organisational level. Many of these innovations overlay the Gov 2.0 sphere but the innovation system is broader than that.

The Review of the National Innovation System Venturous Australia: building strength in innovation identified public sector innovation as an area to be explored with significant potential for gains. Out of this, the Management Advisory Committee of the Australian Public Service is looking at the questions of how innovation in the public sector can be fostered and embedded in the culture. The Management Advisory Committee is a forum of Secretaries and Agency Heads that advises the Government on matters relating to the management of the APS. This project is liaising closely with the Gov 2.0 Taskforce, and will be reporting in a similar timeframe.

We have released a discussion paper setting out some of the main outstanding questions about how innovation in the public sector can be carried out more broadly. The discussion paper, and the associated call for submissions, can be found here. We would be grateful for any submissions entered by close of business on Friday 11 September – this is a complex issue and we are keen to get a number of different perspectives to inform the report.

The project team is also looking to form a loose network of people interested in these issues of the practice of innovation in the public sector. If you are keen to be involved, please email psi@innovation.gov.au noting your interest.

Let me finish this post with a question – if you had just one suggestion for the Management Advisory Committee on how innovation could be embedded in the culture of the APS, what would it be?

]]>
http://gov2.net.au/blog/2009/09/07/advancing-public-sector-innovation/feed/ 16